The active inductor shown in Fig. 4 consists of
a source common transconductor M and a drain common transconductor M
.
It is obvious that Fig. 4 acts as an active
inductor because a configuration of the active inductor is the same
with Fig. 2(a). A gate-to-source parasitic
capacitance of M
is utilized for
.
On the other hand, transconductors used in
Fig. 5 are a source common transconductor M
and a gate common transconductor M
. Bias current of M
and
M
is shared to reduce its power consumption. The configuration of
Fig. 5 is the same with
Fig. 1(a). Gate-to-source capacitances of M
or M
is
used as
.
Input admittance of the active inductors shown in
Fig. 4 and Fig. 5 are
shown in Eqs. (4) and (5) respectively.
Because both of Eqs. (4) and (5) can be
represented by
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
(5) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
(6) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
(7) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
(8) |
Figure 4 requires about twice bias current
compared to Fig. 5. On the other hand, it has
wider input voltage range. Self resonance frequency and of
Fig. 5 are
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
(9) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
(10) |
Takahide Sato 2012-03-31